HerbDev model-development proof of concept
This case study shows the complete model-training workflow: establish a baseline, inspect evidence, make a controlled optimization, rerun the model, and preserve the resulting artifacts.
| validation_accuracy | 0.65 |
|---|---|
| test_accuracy | 0.5875 |
| train_seconds | 0.1277 |
Increase representation capacity and train longer at a lower learning rate after the baseline underfit the nonlinear boundary.
| validation_accuracy | 0.95 |
|---|---|
| test_accuracy | 0.9625 |
| train_seconds | 0.49875 |

| platform | Linux-6.18.35-x86_64-with-glibc2.41 |
|---|---|
| machine | x86_64 |
| python | 3.13.5 |
| torch | 2.10.0+cpu |
| device | cpu |
| mps_available | False |
| cuda_available | False |
| seed | 42 |
Model development is not a single training command. The useful work is creating a reproducible dataset, choosing a defensible baseline, measuring behavior, changing one thing for a reason, retesting, and preserving enough evidence to explain what happened. The same process scales to client data, larger models, and production infrastructure.
The next step is to define the business outcome, available data, constraints, and success metric, then design the smallest experiment that can prove whether machine learning is worth pursuing.